Import Upstream version 2.7.18
This commit is contained in:
135
Doc/extending/building.rst
Normal file
135
Doc/extending/building.rst
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
|
||||
.. highlightlang:: c
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _building:
|
||||
|
||||
********************************************
|
||||
Building C and C++ Extensions with distutils
|
||||
********************************************
|
||||
|
||||
.. sectionauthor:: Martin v. Löwis <martin@v.loewis.de>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Starting in Python 1.4, Python provides, on Unix, a special make file for
|
||||
building make files for building dynamically-linked extensions and custom
|
||||
interpreters. Starting with Python 2.0, this mechanism (known as related to
|
||||
Makefile.pre.in, and Setup files) is no longer supported. Building custom
|
||||
interpreters was rarely used, and extension modules can be built using
|
||||
distutils.
|
||||
|
||||
Building an extension module using distutils requires that distutils is
|
||||
installed on the build machine, which is included in Python 2.x and available
|
||||
separately for Python 1.5. Since distutils also supports creation of binary
|
||||
packages, users don't necessarily need a compiler and distutils to install the
|
||||
extension.
|
||||
|
||||
A distutils package contains a driver script, :file:`setup.py`. This is a plain
|
||||
Python file, which, in the most simple case, could look like this:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from distutils.core import setup, Extension
|
||||
|
||||
module1 = Extension('demo',
|
||||
sources = ['demo.c'])
|
||||
|
||||
setup (name = 'PackageName',
|
||||
version = '1.0',
|
||||
description = 'This is a demo package',
|
||||
ext_modules = [module1])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
With this :file:`setup.py`, and a file :file:`demo.c`, running ::
|
||||
|
||||
python setup.py build
|
||||
|
||||
will compile :file:`demo.c`, and produce an extension module named ``demo`` in
|
||||
the :file:`build` directory. Depending on the system, the module file will end
|
||||
up in a subdirectory :file:`build/lib.system`, and may have a name like
|
||||
:file:`demo.so` or :file:`demo.pyd`.
|
||||
|
||||
In the :file:`setup.py`, all execution is performed by calling the ``setup``
|
||||
function. This takes a variable number of keyword arguments, of which the
|
||||
example above uses only a subset. Specifically, the example specifies
|
||||
meta-information to build packages, and it specifies the contents of the
|
||||
package. Normally, a package will contain of addition modules, like Python
|
||||
source modules, documentation, subpackages, etc. Please refer to the distutils
|
||||
documentation in :ref:`distutils-index` to learn more about the features of
|
||||
distutils; this section explains building extension modules only.
|
||||
|
||||
It is common to pre-compute arguments to :func:`setup`, to better structure the
|
||||
driver script. In the example above, the ``ext_modules`` argument to
|
||||
:func:`setup` is a list of extension modules, each of which is an instance of
|
||||
the :class:`~distutils.extension.Extension`. In the example, the instance
|
||||
defines an extension named ``demo`` which is build by compiling a single source
|
||||
file, :file:`demo.c`.
|
||||
|
||||
In many cases, building an extension is more complex, since additional
|
||||
preprocessor defines and libraries may be needed. This is demonstrated in the
|
||||
example below.
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
from distutils.core import setup, Extension
|
||||
|
||||
module1 = Extension('demo',
|
||||
define_macros = [('MAJOR_VERSION', '1'),
|
||||
('MINOR_VERSION', '0')],
|
||||
include_dirs = ['/usr/local/include'],
|
||||
libraries = ['tcl83'],
|
||||
library_dirs = ['/usr/local/lib'],
|
||||
sources = ['demo.c'])
|
||||
|
||||
setup (name = 'PackageName',
|
||||
version = '1.0',
|
||||
description = 'This is a demo package',
|
||||
author = 'Martin v. Loewis',
|
||||
author_email = 'martin@v.loewis.de',
|
||||
url = 'https://docs.python.org/extending/building',
|
||||
long_description = '''
|
||||
This is really just a demo package.
|
||||
''',
|
||||
ext_modules = [module1])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
In this example, :func:`setup` is called with additional meta-information, which
|
||||
is recommended when distribution packages have to be built. For the extension
|
||||
itself, it specifies preprocessor defines, include directories, library
|
||||
directories, and libraries. Depending on the compiler, distutils passes this
|
||||
information in different ways to the compiler. For example, on Unix, this may
|
||||
result in the compilation commands ::
|
||||
|
||||
gcc -DNDEBUG -g -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -fPIC -DMAJOR_VERSION=1 -DMINOR_VERSION=0 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/python2.2 -c demo.c -o build/temp.linux-i686-2.2/demo.o
|
||||
|
||||
gcc -shared build/temp.linux-i686-2.2/demo.o -L/usr/local/lib -ltcl83 -o build/lib.linux-i686-2.2/demo.so
|
||||
|
||||
These lines are for demonstration purposes only; distutils users should trust
|
||||
that distutils gets the invocations right.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _distributing:
|
||||
|
||||
Distributing your extension modules
|
||||
===================================
|
||||
|
||||
When an extension has been successfully build, there are three ways to use it.
|
||||
|
||||
End-users will typically want to install the module, they do so by running ::
|
||||
|
||||
python setup.py install
|
||||
|
||||
Module maintainers should produce source packages; to do so, they run ::
|
||||
|
||||
python setup.py sdist
|
||||
|
||||
In some cases, additional files need to be included in a source distribution;
|
||||
this is done through a :file:`MANIFEST.in` file; see the distutils documentation
|
||||
for details.
|
||||
|
||||
If the source distribution has been build successfully, maintainers can also
|
||||
create binary distributions. Depending on the platform, one of the following
|
||||
commands can be used to do so. ::
|
||||
|
||||
python setup.py bdist_wininst
|
||||
python setup.py bdist_rpm
|
||||
python setup.py bdist_dumb
|
||||
318
Doc/extending/embedding.rst
Normal file
318
Doc/extending/embedding.rst
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
|
||||
.. highlightlang:: c
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _embedding:
|
||||
|
||||
***************************************
|
||||
Embedding Python in Another Application
|
||||
***************************************
|
||||
|
||||
The previous chapters discussed how to extend Python, that is, how to extend the
|
||||
functionality of Python by attaching a library of C functions to it. It is also
|
||||
possible to do it the other way around: enrich your C/C++ application by
|
||||
embedding Python in it. Embedding provides your application with the ability to
|
||||
implement some of the functionality of your application in Python rather than C
|
||||
or C++. This can be used for many purposes; one example would be to allow users
|
||||
to tailor the application to their needs by writing some scripts in Python. You
|
||||
can also use it yourself if some of the functionality can be written in Python
|
||||
more easily.
|
||||
|
||||
Embedding Python is similar to extending it, but not quite. The difference is
|
||||
that when you extend Python, the main program of the application is still the
|
||||
Python interpreter, while if you embed Python, the main program may have nothing
|
||||
to do with Python --- instead, some parts of the application occasionally call
|
||||
the Python interpreter to run some Python code.
|
||||
|
||||
So if you are embedding Python, you are providing your own main program. One of
|
||||
the things this main program has to do is initialize the Python interpreter. At
|
||||
the very least, you have to call the function :c:func:`Py_Initialize`. There are
|
||||
optional calls to pass command line arguments to Python. Then later you can
|
||||
call the interpreter from any part of the application.
|
||||
|
||||
There are several different ways to call the interpreter: you can pass a string
|
||||
containing Python statements to :c:func:`PyRun_SimpleString`, or you can pass a
|
||||
stdio file pointer and a file name (for identification in error messages only)
|
||||
to :c:func:`PyRun_SimpleFile`. You can also call the lower-level operations
|
||||
described in the previous chapters to construct and use Python objects.
|
||||
|
||||
A simple demo of embedding Python can be found in the directory
|
||||
:file:`Demo/embed/` of the source distribution.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. seealso::
|
||||
|
||||
:ref:`c-api-index`
|
||||
The details of Python's C interface are given in this manual. A great deal of
|
||||
necessary information can be found here.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _high-level-embedding:
|
||||
|
||||
Very High Level Embedding
|
||||
=========================
|
||||
|
||||
The simplest form of embedding Python is the use of the very high level
|
||||
interface. This interface is intended to execute a Python script without needing
|
||||
to interact with the application directly. This can for example be used to
|
||||
perform some operation on a file. ::
|
||||
|
||||
#include <Python.h>
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
main(int argc, char *argv[])
|
||||
{
|
||||
Py_SetProgramName(argv[0]); /* optional but recommended */
|
||||
Py_Initialize();
|
||||
PyRun_SimpleString("from time import time,ctime\n"
|
||||
"print 'Today is',ctime(time())\n");
|
||||
Py_Finalize();
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
The :c:func:`Py_SetProgramName` function should be called before
|
||||
:c:func:`Py_Initialize` to inform the interpreter about paths to Python run-time
|
||||
libraries. Next, the Python interpreter is initialized with
|
||||
:c:func:`Py_Initialize`, followed by the execution of a hard-coded Python script
|
||||
that prints the date and time. Afterwards, the :c:func:`Py_Finalize` call shuts
|
||||
the interpreter down, followed by the end of the program. In a real program,
|
||||
you may want to get the Python script from another source, perhaps a text-editor
|
||||
routine, a file, or a database. Getting the Python code from a file can better
|
||||
be done by using the :c:func:`PyRun_SimpleFile` function, which saves you the
|
||||
trouble of allocating memory space and loading the file contents.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _lower-level-embedding:
|
||||
|
||||
Beyond Very High Level Embedding: An overview
|
||||
=============================================
|
||||
|
||||
The high level interface gives you the ability to execute arbitrary pieces of
|
||||
Python code from your application, but exchanging data values is quite
|
||||
cumbersome to say the least. If you want that, you should use lower level calls.
|
||||
At the cost of having to write more C code, you can achieve almost anything.
|
||||
|
||||
It should be noted that extending Python and embedding Python is quite the same
|
||||
activity, despite the different intent. Most topics discussed in the previous
|
||||
chapters are still valid. To show this, consider what the extension code from
|
||||
Python to C really does:
|
||||
|
||||
#. Convert data values from Python to C,
|
||||
|
||||
#. Perform a function call to a C routine using the converted values, and
|
||||
|
||||
#. Convert the data values from the call from C to Python.
|
||||
|
||||
When embedding Python, the interface code does:
|
||||
|
||||
#. Convert data values from C to Python,
|
||||
|
||||
#. Perform a function call to a Python interface routine using the converted
|
||||
values, and
|
||||
|
||||
#. Convert the data values from the call from Python to C.
|
||||
|
||||
As you can see, the data conversion steps are simply swapped to accommodate the
|
||||
different direction of the cross-language transfer. The only difference is the
|
||||
routine that you call between both data conversions. When extending, you call a
|
||||
C routine, when embedding, you call a Python routine.
|
||||
|
||||
This chapter will not discuss how to convert data from Python to C and vice
|
||||
versa. Also, proper use of references and dealing with errors is assumed to be
|
||||
understood. Since these aspects do not differ from extending the interpreter,
|
||||
you can refer to earlier chapters for the required information.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _pure-embedding:
|
||||
|
||||
Pure Embedding
|
||||
==============
|
||||
|
||||
The first program aims to execute a function in a Python script. Like in the
|
||||
section about the very high level interface, the Python interpreter does not
|
||||
directly interact with the application (but that will change in the next
|
||||
section).
|
||||
|
||||
The code to run a function defined in a Python script is:
|
||||
|
||||
.. literalinclude:: ../includes/run-func.c
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
This code loads a Python script using ``argv[1]``, and calls the function named
|
||||
in ``argv[2]``. Its integer arguments are the other values of the ``argv``
|
||||
array. If you compile and link this program (let's call the finished executable
|
||||
:program:`call`), and use it to execute a Python script, such as:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
def multiply(a,b):
|
||||
print "Will compute", a, "times", b
|
||||
c = 0
|
||||
for i in range(0, a):
|
||||
c = c + b
|
||||
return c
|
||||
|
||||
then the result should be:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: shell-session
|
||||
|
||||
$ call multiply multiply 3 2
|
||||
Will compute 3 times 2
|
||||
Result of call: 6
|
||||
|
||||
Although the program is quite large for its functionality, most of the code is
|
||||
for data conversion between Python and C, and for error reporting. The
|
||||
interesting part with respect to embedding Python starts with ::
|
||||
|
||||
Py_Initialize();
|
||||
pName = PyString_FromString(argv[1]);
|
||||
/* Error checking of pName left out */
|
||||
pModule = PyImport_Import(pName);
|
||||
|
||||
After initializing the interpreter, the script is loaded using
|
||||
:c:func:`PyImport_Import`. This routine needs a Python string as its argument,
|
||||
which is constructed using the :c:func:`PyString_FromString` data conversion
|
||||
routine. ::
|
||||
|
||||
pFunc = PyObject_GetAttrString(pModule, argv[2]);
|
||||
/* pFunc is a new reference */
|
||||
|
||||
if (pFunc && PyCallable_Check(pFunc)) {
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
Py_XDECREF(pFunc);
|
||||
|
||||
Once the script is loaded, the name we're looking for is retrieved using
|
||||
:c:func:`PyObject_GetAttrString`. If the name exists, and the object returned is
|
||||
callable, you can safely assume that it is a function. The program then
|
||||
proceeds by constructing a tuple of arguments as normal. The call to the Python
|
||||
function is then made with::
|
||||
|
||||
pValue = PyObject_CallObject(pFunc, pArgs);
|
||||
|
||||
Upon return of the function, ``pValue`` is either *NULL* or it contains a
|
||||
reference to the return value of the function. Be sure to release the reference
|
||||
after examining the value.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _extending-with-embedding:
|
||||
|
||||
Extending Embedded Python
|
||||
=========================
|
||||
|
||||
Until now, the embedded Python interpreter had no access to functionality from
|
||||
the application itself. The Python API allows this by extending the embedded
|
||||
interpreter. That is, the embedded interpreter gets extended with routines
|
||||
provided by the application. While it sounds complex, it is not so bad. Simply
|
||||
forget for a while that the application starts the Python interpreter. Instead,
|
||||
consider the application to be a set of subroutines, and write some glue code
|
||||
that gives Python access to those routines, just like you would write a normal
|
||||
Python extension. For example::
|
||||
|
||||
static int numargs=0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Return the number of arguments of the application command line */
|
||||
static PyObject*
|
||||
emb_numargs(PyObject *self, PyObject *args)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if(!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, ":numargs"))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
return Py_BuildValue("i", numargs);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static PyMethodDef EmbMethods[] = {
|
||||
{"numargs", emb_numargs, METH_VARARGS,
|
||||
"Return the number of arguments received by the process."},
|
||||
{NULL, NULL, 0, NULL}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
Insert the above code just above the :c:func:`main` function. Also, insert the
|
||||
following two statements directly after :c:func:`Py_Initialize`::
|
||||
|
||||
numargs = argc;
|
||||
Py_InitModule("emb", EmbMethods);
|
||||
|
||||
These two lines initialize the ``numargs`` variable, and make the
|
||||
:func:`emb.numargs` function accessible to the embedded Python interpreter.
|
||||
With these extensions, the Python script can do things like
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
import emb
|
||||
print "Number of arguments", emb.numargs()
|
||||
|
||||
In a real application, the methods will expose an API of the application to
|
||||
Python.
|
||||
|
||||
.. TODO: threads, code examples do not really behave well if errors happen
|
||||
(what to watch out for)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _embeddingincplusplus:
|
||||
|
||||
Embedding Python in C++
|
||||
=======================
|
||||
|
||||
It is also possible to embed Python in a C++ program; precisely how this is done
|
||||
will depend on the details of the C++ system used; in general you will need to
|
||||
write the main program in C++, and use the C++ compiler to compile and link your
|
||||
program. There is no need to recompile Python itself using C++.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _link-reqs:
|
||||
|
||||
Compiling and Linking under Unix-like systems
|
||||
=============================================
|
||||
|
||||
It is not necessarily trivial to find the right flags to pass to your
|
||||
compiler (and linker) in order to embed the Python interpreter into your
|
||||
application, particularly because Python needs to load library modules
|
||||
implemented as C dynamic extensions (:file:`.so` files) linked against
|
||||
it.
|
||||
|
||||
To find out the required compiler and linker flags, you can execute the
|
||||
:file:`python{X.Y}-config` script which is generated as part of the
|
||||
installation process (a :file:`python-config` script may also be
|
||||
available). This script has several options, of which the following will
|
||||
be directly useful to you:
|
||||
|
||||
* ``pythonX.Y-config --cflags`` will give you the recommended flags when
|
||||
compiling:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: shell-session
|
||||
|
||||
$ /opt/bin/python2.7-config --cflags
|
||||
-I/opt/include/python2.7 -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
|
||||
|
||||
* ``pythonX.Y-config --ldflags`` will give you the recommended flags when
|
||||
linking:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: shell-session
|
||||
|
||||
$ /opt/bin/python2.7-config --ldflags
|
||||
-L/opt/lib/python2.7/config -lpthread -ldl -lutil -lm -lpython2.7 -Xlinker -export-dynamic
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
To avoid confusion between several Python installations (and especially
|
||||
between the system Python and your own compiled Python), it is recommended
|
||||
that you use the absolute path to :file:`python{X.Y}-config`, as in the above
|
||||
example.
|
||||
|
||||
If this procedure doesn't work for you (it is not guaranteed to work for
|
||||
all Unix-like platforms; however, we welcome :ref:`bug reports <reporting-bugs>`)
|
||||
you will have to read your system's documentation about dynamic linking and/or
|
||||
examine Python's :file:`Makefile` (use :func:`sysconfig.get_makefile_filename`
|
||||
to find its location) and compilation
|
||||
options. In this case, the :mod:`sysconfig` module is a useful tool to
|
||||
programmatically extract the configuration values that you will want to
|
||||
combine together. For example:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: python
|
||||
|
||||
>>> import sysconfig
|
||||
>>> sysconfig.get_config_var('LIBS')
|
||||
'-lpthread -ldl -lutil'
|
||||
>>> sysconfig.get_config_var('LINKFORSHARED')
|
||||
'-Xlinker -export-dynamic'
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. XXX similar documentation for Windows missing
|
||||
1324
Doc/extending/extending.rst
Normal file
1324
Doc/extending/extending.rst
Normal file
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
41
Doc/extending/index.rst
Normal file
41
Doc/extending/index.rst
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
.. _extending-index:
|
||||
|
||||
##################################################
|
||||
Extending and Embedding the Python Interpreter
|
||||
##################################################
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes how to write modules in C or C++ to extend the Python
|
||||
interpreter with new modules. Those modules can not only define new functions
|
||||
but also new object types and their methods. The document also describes how
|
||||
to embed the Python interpreter in another application, for use as an extension
|
||||
language. Finally, it shows how to compile and link extension modules so that
|
||||
they can be loaded dynamically (at run time) into the interpreter, if the
|
||||
underlying operating system supports this feature.
|
||||
|
||||
This document assumes basic knowledge about Python. For an informal
|
||||
introduction to the language, see :ref:`tutorial-index`. :ref:`reference-index`
|
||||
gives a more formal definition of the language. :ref:`library-index` documents
|
||||
the existing object types, functions and modules (both built-in and written in
|
||||
Python) that give the language its wide application range.
|
||||
|
||||
For a detailed description of the whole Python/C API, see the separate
|
||||
:ref:`c-api-index`.
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
|
||||
This guide only covers the basic tools for creating extensions provided
|
||||
as part of this version of CPython. Third party tools may offer simpler
|
||||
alternatives. Refer to the `binary extensions section
|
||||
<https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/extensions/>`__ in the Python
|
||||
Packaging User Guide for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. toctree::
|
||||
:maxdepth: 2
|
||||
:numbered:
|
||||
|
||||
extending.rst
|
||||
newtypes.rst
|
||||
building.rst
|
||||
windows.rst
|
||||
embedding.rst
|
||||
1590
Doc/extending/newtypes.rst
Normal file
1590
Doc/extending/newtypes.rst
Normal file
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
137
Doc/extending/windows.rst
Normal file
137
Doc/extending/windows.rst
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
|
||||
.. highlightlang:: c
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _building-on-windows:
|
||||
|
||||
****************************************
|
||||
Building C and C++ Extensions on Windows
|
||||
****************************************
|
||||
|
||||
This chapter briefly explains how to create a Windows extension module for
|
||||
Python using Microsoft Visual C++, and follows with more detailed background
|
||||
information on how it works. The explanatory material is useful for both the
|
||||
Windows programmer learning to build Python extensions and the Unix programmer
|
||||
interested in producing software which can be successfully built on both Unix
|
||||
and Windows.
|
||||
|
||||
Module authors are encouraged to use the distutils approach for building
|
||||
extension modules, instead of the one described in this section. You will still
|
||||
need the C compiler that was used to build Python; typically Microsoft Visual
|
||||
C++.
|
||||
|
||||
.. note::
|
||||
|
||||
This chapter mentions a number of filenames that include an encoded Python
|
||||
version number. These filenames are represented with the version number shown
|
||||
as ``XY``; in practice, ``'X'`` will be the major version number and ``'Y'``
|
||||
will be the minor version number of the Python release you're working with. For
|
||||
example, if you are using Python 2.2.1, ``XY`` will actually be ``22``.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _win-cookbook:
|
||||
|
||||
A Cookbook Approach
|
||||
===================
|
||||
|
||||
There are two approaches to building extension modules on Windows, just as there
|
||||
are on Unix: use the :mod:`distutils` package to control the build process, or
|
||||
do things manually. The distutils approach works well for most extensions;
|
||||
documentation on using :mod:`distutils` to build and package extension modules
|
||||
is available in :ref:`distutils-index`. If you find you really need to do
|
||||
things manually, it may be instructive to study the project file for the
|
||||
:source:`winsound <PCbuild/winsound.vcxproj>` standard library module.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _dynamic-linking:
|
||||
|
||||
Differences Between Unix and Windows
|
||||
====================================
|
||||
|
||||
.. sectionauthor:: Chris Phoenix <cphoenix@best.com>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Unix and Windows use completely different paradigms for run-time loading of
|
||||
code. Before you try to build a module that can be dynamically loaded, be aware
|
||||
of how your system works.
|
||||
|
||||
In Unix, a shared object (:file:`.so`) file contains code to be used by the
|
||||
program, and also the names of functions and data that it expects to find in the
|
||||
program. When the file is joined to the program, all references to those
|
||||
functions and data in the file's code are changed to point to the actual
|
||||
locations in the program where the functions and data are placed in memory.
|
||||
This is basically a link operation.
|
||||
|
||||
In Windows, a dynamic-link library (:file:`.dll`) file has no dangling
|
||||
references. Instead, an access to functions or data goes through a lookup
|
||||
table. So the DLL code does not have to be fixed up at runtime to refer to the
|
||||
program's memory; instead, the code already uses the DLL's lookup table, and the
|
||||
lookup table is modified at runtime to point to the functions and data.
|
||||
|
||||
In Unix, there is only one type of library file (:file:`.a`) which contains code
|
||||
from several object files (:file:`.o`). During the link step to create a shared
|
||||
object file (:file:`.so`), the linker may find that it doesn't know where an
|
||||
identifier is defined. The linker will look for it in the object files in the
|
||||
libraries; if it finds it, it will include all the code from that object file.
|
||||
|
||||
In Windows, there are two types of library, a static library and an import
|
||||
library (both called :file:`.lib`). A static library is like a Unix :file:`.a`
|
||||
file; it contains code to be included as necessary. An import library is
|
||||
basically used only to reassure the linker that a certain identifier is legal,
|
||||
and will be present in the program when the DLL is loaded. So the linker uses
|
||||
the information from the import library to build the lookup table for using
|
||||
identifiers that are not included in the DLL. When an application or a DLL is
|
||||
linked, an import library may be generated, which will need to be used for all
|
||||
future DLLs that depend on the symbols in the application or DLL.
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose you are building two dynamic-load modules, B and C, which should share
|
||||
another block of code A. On Unix, you would *not* pass :file:`A.a` to the
|
||||
linker for :file:`B.so` and :file:`C.so`; that would cause it to be included
|
||||
twice, so that B and C would each have their own copy. In Windows, building
|
||||
:file:`A.dll` will also build :file:`A.lib`. You *do* pass :file:`A.lib` to the
|
||||
linker for B and C. :file:`A.lib` does not contain code; it just contains
|
||||
information which will be used at runtime to access A's code.
|
||||
|
||||
In Windows, using an import library is sort of like using ``import spam``; it
|
||||
gives you access to spam's names, but does not create a separate copy. On Unix,
|
||||
linking with a library is more like ``from spam import *``; it does create a
|
||||
separate copy.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _win-dlls:
|
||||
|
||||
Using DLLs in Practice
|
||||
======================
|
||||
|
||||
.. sectionauthor:: Chris Phoenix <cphoenix@best.com>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Windows Python is built in Microsoft Visual C++; using other compilers may or
|
||||
may not work (though Borland seems to). The rest of this section is MSVC++
|
||||
specific.
|
||||
|
||||
When creating DLLs in Windows, you must pass :file:`pythonXY.lib` to the linker.
|
||||
To build two DLLs, spam and ni (which uses C functions found in spam), you could
|
||||
use these commands::
|
||||
|
||||
cl /LD /I/python/include spam.c ../libs/pythonXY.lib
|
||||
cl /LD /I/python/include ni.c spam.lib ../libs/pythonXY.lib
|
||||
|
||||
The first command created three files: :file:`spam.obj`, :file:`spam.dll` and
|
||||
:file:`spam.lib`. :file:`Spam.dll` does not contain any Python functions (such
|
||||
as :c:func:`PyArg_ParseTuple`), but it does know how to find the Python code
|
||||
thanks to :file:`pythonXY.lib`.
|
||||
|
||||
The second command created :file:`ni.dll` (and :file:`.obj` and :file:`.lib`),
|
||||
which knows how to find the necessary functions from spam, and also from the
|
||||
Python executable.
|
||||
|
||||
Not every identifier is exported to the lookup table. If you want any other
|
||||
modules (including Python) to be able to see your identifiers, you have to say
|
||||
``_declspec(dllexport)``, as in ``void _declspec(dllexport) initspam(void)`` or
|
||||
``PyObject _declspec(dllexport) *NiGetSpamData(void)``.
|
||||
|
||||
Developer Studio will throw in a lot of import libraries that you do not really
|
||||
need, adding about 100K to your executable. To get rid of them, use the Project
|
||||
Settings dialog, Link tab, to specify *ignore default libraries*. Add the
|
||||
correct :file:`msvcrtxx.lib` to the list of libraries.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user