From 34c4ff49124885e0254c3ec481e524408a1c9685 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: leitner Date: Thu, 7 May 2015 22:53:13 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] double free probably only an issue if you are not using dietlibc --- THANKS | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/THANKS b/THANKS index 9d1643a..e9a2e7f 100644 --- a/THANKS +++ b/THANKS @@ -14,4 +14,5 @@ Andreas Stührk found a possible integer underflow in the indexing code. I'd be astounded if someone found a way to exploit it, though. Andreas also ran tinyldap in afl and found two double frees. -At least one of them looks like it might be exploitable. +At least one of them looks like it might be exploitable if you are not +using dietlibc.