361 lines
17 KiB
Plaintext
361 lines
17 KiB
Plaintext
SnapRAID TODO
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
This is the list of TODO items for SnapRAID.
|
|
|
|
- Next
|
|
|
|
- Minor
|
|
|
|
* Add a new -u, --filter-updated command that filters files
|
|
with a different timestamp, to be able to restore only them to the previous state.
|
|
See: https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/e26e787d/
|
|
|
|
* Allow to filter in diff/list by disk name.
|
|
Not checked disks should be allowed to be missing.
|
|
|
|
* Add an option to ignore subsecond timestamp.
|
|
Like when you copy data to a filesystem with less timestamp precision.
|
|
|
|
* Extend haspdeep to support the SnapRAID hash :
|
|
https://github.com/jessek/hashdeep/
|
|
https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/90b0e9b2/?limit=25
|
|
|
|
* Add a "noaccessdenied" config option to exclude not readable files/dirs.
|
|
Like the "nohidden".
|
|
See: https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/1409c26a/
|
|
|
|
* Don't insert new files if they are new opened by other applications.
|
|
Not yet sure how to check if a file is open in a fast way.
|
|
In case we can exclude files created too recently, like with a --min-age option.
|
|
See: https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/a1683dd9/?limit=25#1e16
|
|
|
|
* Add markdown support for output
|
|
See: https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/661cce8b/
|
|
|
|
* Add ZFS support for SMART and UUID.
|
|
See latest messages at: https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/42defa3b/
|
|
|
|
* Change all the path printed in the terminal as relative and not absolute.
|
|
https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/648955ec/ (Leifi in diff)
|
|
https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/5b6ef1b9/ (Miles in check + filter)
|
|
Partially done. Now you can control it with --test-fmt
|
|
|
|
* Add ReFS support with 128 bits inode
|
|
See: https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/2be14f63/
|
|
https://github.com/Microsoft/Windows-driver-samples/blob/master/filesys/miniFilter/avscan/filter/utility.h
|
|
https://github.com/Microsoft/Windows-driver-samples/blob/master/filesys/miniFilter/avscan/filter/utility.c
|
|
https://github.com/Microsoft/Windows-driver-samples/blob/master/filesys/miniFilter/delete/delete.c
|
|
Partially done. Until the inodes are less than 64 bit, everything works.
|
|
If a 128 bit inode is found, it aborts with "Invalid inode number! Is this ReFS?"
|
|
|
|
* When a disk is replaced, and SnapRAID detect this by a UUID change, we could clear the
|
|
scrub information for that disk.
|
|
https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/ee87901b/
|
|
|
|
* In fix, automatic --import excluded directory in the config file.
|
|
https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/c80c42e5/?limit=25
|
|
|
|
* Allow to have "partial" parity disks, smaller than required ?
|
|
https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/e924c663/
|
|
|
|
* How to handle corrupt copied/moved files ? At now pre-hash checks them,
|
|
but if a corruption is found, it stops the sync process.
|
|
This is not optimal, because the 'sync' command is stopped instead to continue.
|
|
A possible solution could be:
|
|
If a copied block is corrupt, we can recover the original one from parity (if moved),
|
|
or read it directly from disk (if copied), and we can use this one to build the parity,
|
|
working around the corruption, that can be later fixed with "fix".
|
|
This requires to allocate blocks of moved files in parity positions *after* the
|
|
currently used one.
|
|
|
|
* Some programs are misusing the FILE_ATTRIBUTE_TEMPORARY.
|
|
In fact, it makes sense as it's a good way to control the cache on the file,
|
|
so, despite the name, that usage could be common for not temporary files.
|
|
https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/57d40108/
|
|
|
|
* Restore ownership and permissions, at least in Unix.
|
|
|
|
* Restore directory timestamps.
|
|
|
|
* Add an option for dup to list only duplicates with different name.
|
|
This supposing that if a file has the same name, it's intentionally duplicated.
|
|
|
|
* In fix an existing symlink with the same name of a file to be recovered may stop
|
|
the process making the create() operation to fail.
|
|
The same for directories, when recreating the directory tree.
|
|
|
|
* If a directory exists with the same name of a parity/content file be more explicative
|
|
on the error message. See: https://sourceforge.net/projects/snapraid/forums/forum/1677233/topic/4861034
|
|
|
|
* We don't try to do partial block recovering. A block is correct or not.
|
|
But if only some bytes, or a sector, is wrong, it should be possible to recover all the
|
|
rest of the block.
|
|
The problem is that we don't have any hash to ensure that the block is partially recovered,
|
|
or completely garbage. But it makes sense to anyway write the "most likely" correct one.
|
|
|
|
- Naming
|
|
|
|
* A new 'init' command to differentiate the first 'sync' operation.
|
|
This 'init' will work also without a content file, and parity files.
|
|
Instead 'sync' will require all of them.
|
|
This will also help when running with the parity filesystem unmounted.
|
|
|
|
* Rename sync->backup and fix->restore. It seems to me a naming expressing
|
|
better the meaning of the commands. But not yet sure.
|
|
|
|
- Pooling
|
|
|
|
* Add a new "commit" command to move changes from the pool to the array.
|
|
It should:
|
|
- Move files copied into the pool (that are no links) to the array.
|
|
The files should be moved to the disk that contains most of the files
|
|
in the directory. If no space, try with the disk with less files
|
|
in the directory, and eventually the disk in the array with more free space.
|
|
- Detect renames, and apply them in the array.
|
|
The file will be renamed and moved to the new directory, if changed,
|
|
but kept in the same disk of the array.
|
|
- Detect deletes, and move file in the array to a "/trash/" directory
|
|
of the same disk. For safety no real deletion is done.
|
|
File with the same name will get an extra extension like ".1", ".2".
|
|
|
|
- Major
|
|
|
|
* Uses a separated file for storing hashes, to allow to use a memory
|
|
mapped file to decrease memory utilization.
|
|
The file can contains hashes stored in the same order they are accessed
|
|
in sync/check/scrub.
|
|
+ A lot less memory utilization
|
|
- It will be slow in --pre-hash as the files are accessed in another order,
|
|
but no much slow.
|
|
- How to handle multiple .content file copy ? When working we can have
|
|
only a single file. When storing the .content we'll have to copy it
|
|
in all the places.
|
|
* Can we mix the existing and new approach ? We can create this
|
|
hash file at startup in a memory mapped "temporary" file.
|
|
It may takes some time to create it, but then it will be fast.
|
|
See: https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/cdea773f/
|
|
|
|
* Allocate parity minimizing concurrent use of it
|
|
Each parity allocation should check for a parity
|
|
range with less utilization by other disks.
|
|
We need to take care do disable this meachnism when the parity space
|
|
is near to fillup the parity partition.
|
|
See: https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/1797bf7d/
|
|
+ This increase the possibility of recovering with multiple failures with not
|
|
enough parity, as the benefit of existing parity is maximized.
|
|
- Possible increase of fragmentation of parity allocation
|
|
- No real benefit when the array is filled
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rejected TODO
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
This is a list of rejected TODO items.
|
|
|
|
* Allow multiple parity files and to coexist with data
|
|
in the same disk.
|
|
This is possible if the data in the same disk uses parity addresses not
|
|
contained in the parity file present in the same disk.
|
|
+ It's a nice trick. The disk containing parity, will have less space available,
|
|
and then it will need less parity, resolving the problem of the parity disk being too small.
|
|
+ We can also think at an automated parity files naming and creation, removing
|
|
the need of the user to specify that. We can also completely remove the
|
|
concept of parity drive, automatically allocating parity in the most free data drives.
|
|
- It won't be not nice to have the program to automatically
|
|
choose where to create the parity, because the choice cannot be optimal.
|
|
With a dedicated disk manually chosen, it's instead optimal.
|
|
+ We can limit this coexist possibility only to latest parity file,
|
|
allowing the user to choose where to put it.
|
|
- It won't work with disks of different size.
|
|
Suppose to have all disks of size N, with only one of size M>N.
|
|
To fully use the M space, you can allocate a full N parity in such disk,
|
|
but the remaning space will also need additional parity in the other disks,
|
|
in fact requiring a total of M parity for the array.
|
|
In the end, we cannot avoid that the first biggest disk added is fully
|
|
dedicated to parity, even if it means to leave some space unused.
|
|
|
|
* Directly access disks for parity skipping the filesystem layer
|
|
- No real performance or space gain compared to a custom filesystem configuration like:
|
|
mkfs.ext3 -i 16777216 -m0 -O ^dir_index,large_file,sparse_super /dev/sdX1
|
|
See: https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/9c0ef324/?limit=25
|
|
|
|
* Allow to specify more than one disk directories to cover the case of multi partitions.
|
|
Different partitions have duplicate inode. The only way to support this is to
|
|
add also a kind of device_id, increasing the memory required.
|
|
But it should be only few bits for each file. So, it should be manageable.
|
|
A lot of discussions about this feature :)
|
|
https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/b2cd9385/
|
|
- The only benefit is to distribute better the data. This could help the recovery process,
|
|
in case of multiple failures. But no real usability or funtionality benefit in the normal
|
|
case.
|
|
|
|
* https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/2cb97e8a/
|
|
Have two hashes for each file. One for the first segment, that may use only a part of the first parity block.
|
|
And a second hash that takes care of the final segment, also using only part of a parity block.
|
|
Intermediate blocks can be handled like now.
|
|
The first and last segment can use only a part of the parity block, sharing it with other files,
|
|
and then allowing big parity blocks.
|
|
+ Big parity block, like 1MB, and small file allocation, like 4KB.
|
|
- It won't be possible to copy hash info from one disk to another, as copied files
|
|
may have a different block splitting. Copied file should be allocated with the same exact
|
|
splitting.
|
|
- Dup detection can be handled with a dedicated hash covering the full file. But increasing
|
|
the number of hash for each file to three.
|
|
- No way to handle block import.
|
|
|
|
* Create a filesystem snapshot at every sync, and use it in all the other commands
|
|
automatically.
|
|
At the next sync, drop the old snapshot and create a new one.
|
|
This should help recovering, because we'll have the exact copy used by sync.
|
|
This feature can be enabled with a specific option, and available
|
|
in Windows using Shadow Copy, and in Linux using Btrfs, and in a generic
|
|
Unix using ZFS.
|
|
See Jens's Windows script at: http://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/a1707211/
|
|
Note that a different between Windows and Unix is that in Windows old snapshots
|
|
are automatically deleted.
|
|
|
|
* Checks if splitting hash/parity computation in 4K pages
|
|
can improve speed in sync. That should increase cache locality,
|
|
because we read the data two times for hash and and parity,
|
|
and if we manage to keep it in the cache, we should save time.
|
|
- We now hash first the faster disks, and this could
|
|
reduce performance as we'll have to wait for all disks.
|
|
|
|
* Use threads to scan all the disks at the same time.
|
|
- After 7.0 Windows changes it seems fast enough even
|
|
with a mono thread implementation.
|
|
|
|
* Enable storing of creation time NTFS, crtime/birth time EXT4.
|
|
But see: http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/50177/birth-is-empty-on-ext4
|
|
coreutils stat has an example, but it doesn't work in Linux (see lib/stat-time.h)
|
|
- Not supported in Linux.
|
|
|
|
* In the content file save the timestamp of the parity files.
|
|
If they do not match, stop the processing.
|
|
This can be done to avoid to use not synchronized parity and content files,
|
|
resulting in wrong data.
|
|
But if the sync process is killed we need a way to resyncronize them.
|
|
Or maybe we should allow parity newer than content, but not viceversa.
|
|
- The corner cases are too many. A fixed parity may be never.
|
|
A someway modified content may be never. So, the time is not really significant.
|
|
|
|
* Use Async IO for Linux (libaio).
|
|
See thread: https://sourceforge.net/p/snapraid/discussion/1677233/thread/a300a10b/
|
|
Docs at: http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/~vass/linux-aio.txt
|
|
- Implemented for scrub in the "libaio" branch, but it's slower of
|
|
about 20% in my machine.
|
|
|
|
* Allow to put parity directly into the underline block device without the need
|
|
of any filesystem.
|
|
That would allow to increase a lot the free space for parity.
|
|
We can implement some kind of filesystem detection to avoid to overwrite an already
|
|
existing filesystem.
|
|
- Still risky if stuffs go wrong.
|
|
- In Linux with largefile4 there is only a very small amount of space wasted.
|
|
In the order of 0.01%. Not really worth to do it.
|
|
- With NTFS the saving is also limited, because the "reserved" MFT of 12.5% is
|
|
not really exclusively reserved, but can be used also for normal files,
|
|
when all the remaining space is filled.
|
|
|
|
* The data could be compressed before processing, resulting in parity block of
|
|
fixed size, but matching different data block sizes.
|
|
The complexity is that a file blocks will have to be allocated at runtime,
|
|
and you may run out of them in the middle of the processing.
|
|
We need also a way to compress a stream until the compressed data reach the
|
|
block size, but no more, and then start a new block.
|
|
For each block, we'll have also to store. "size_uncompressed", "size_compressed",
|
|
"hash".
|
|
- It will be too slow.
|
|
- Not addressing the problem of a lot of small files, as still one block will be
|
|
allocated for each file.
|
|
|
|
* Uses different block size for parity and file allocation.
|
|
We can use a big size, like 1MB for parity allocation and hash computation,
|
|
and at the same time using a 4K blocks for files allocation.
|
|
This means that a parity blocks may contain more than one file.
|
|
- We'll have to drop the dup and import feature,
|
|
because it won't be possible anymore to compare the hash of files,
|
|
as it would depend also on the start address inside the parity block.
|
|
- When a hash fail, it won't be possible to tell which file is really
|
|
broken, because more file may share the same parity block.
|
|
|
|
* Have special parity blocks containing the last blocks of more files
|
|
until it's filled up.
|
|
For such parity blocks, we'll have more than one hash. One for each
|
|
file contained.
|
|
- Parity will be too fragmented, because we'll have parity blocks
|
|
containing the last blocks of many files.
|
|
|
|
* In "pool" for Windows, and for unique directories a junction to the
|
|
directory could be used, avoiding to use symlinks to files.
|
|
This allows to overcome the problem of sharing symlinks.
|
|
- It would work, in fact it would work to well. The problem is that
|
|
Windows will treat the junction as the real directory, like *really*
|
|
deleting its content from Explorer pressing "del" and also from the
|
|
command line with "rd". Too dangerous.
|
|
|
|
* When fixing, before overwriting the present file, make a copy of it just in
|
|
case that the original file cannot be completely recovered.
|
|
We can always open files in read-only mode, if a write is required, we close it,
|
|
rename it to with a .bak extension, and rewrite it up to the required size.
|
|
The same for symlink if a file with the same name exist or viceversa.
|
|
- The idea behind this is to avoid to leave untouched a file if we cannot
|
|
restore it completely. But it's debatable what's better in this case.
|
|
Anyway, considering the typical use, it's not really relevant.
|
|
|
|
* In the import list, uses also all the blocks in the array.
|
|
But we must cover the case of bad blocks. Likely we can just check the
|
|
hash after reading, and in case, skip it, and retry with another copy.
|
|
- It will work only for duplicate files. Not really worth do to it.
|
|
|
|
* Save the content file in compressed .gz format to save space.
|
|
- Compression is too slow. Even using the very fast lzo.
|
|
$ time lzop -1 < content > content.lzo
|
|
real 1m23.014s
|
|
user 0m40.822s
|
|
sys 0m3.389s
|
|
|
|
$ time ./gzip -1 < content > content.gz
|
|
real 1m47.463s
|
|
user 1m23.732s
|
|
sys 0m3.290s
|
|
|
|
$ time ./gzip --huffonly < content > contentH.gz
|
|
real 1m51.607s
|
|
user 1m30.032s
|
|
sys 0m3.245s
|
|
|
|
Similar command done with snapraid without compression, and involving also decoding
|
|
and encoding takes less time.
|
|
|
|
$ time ./snapraid --test-skip-device --test-skip-self -v -c ./test.conf test-rewrite
|
|
real 0m59.087s
|
|
user 0m14.164s
|
|
sys 0m4.398s
|
|
|
|
* Recognizes that a file is moved from one disk to another, and if the parity
|
|
data doesn't overlap, do not recompute it.
|
|
- It's going to work only in RAID5 mode and only in special cases.
|
|
|
|
* Implements a multithread sync command to share HASH and RAID computations
|
|
to different CPUs.
|
|
- At now it's questionable if it will result in a performance improvement.
|
|
The murmur3 hash, and the RAID5/6 computations are so fast that even a single
|
|
thread should be able to do them.
|
|
Use the "snapraid -T" comment to see the speed.
|
|
|
|
* In the repair() function the heuristic to detect if we recovered after the sync,
|
|
can be extended to all the previous blocks, because we always proceed in block
|
|
order during a sync.
|
|
So, if for a block we can detect that we recovered using updated parity data,
|
|
also for all the previous blocks this is true.
|
|
Anyway, the case where this information could be useful should be present
|
|
only if changes are committed after an aborted sync.
|
|
- No real advantage on that, beside some speed gain in fix.
|
|
The risk would be instead to miss some recovery opportunity.
|
|
So, makes sense to have it a little slower but trying any
|
|
possible recovery strategy.
|
|
|
|
|