From bongo-general-bounces@forge.novell.com Thu May  4 12:27:53 2006
Return-Path: <rprice@bongo.ximian.com>
Delivered-To: dave@ximian.com
Received: from herald.ximian.com (frontgate.ximian.com [130.57.169.19]) by
	skeptopotamus.ximian.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D946308A for
	<Dave@ximian.com>; Thu,  4 May 2006 12:27:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by herald.ximian.com (Postfix, from userid 2601) id 0B7A270080;
	Thu,  4 May 2006 12:27:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from victor.provo.novell.com (victor.provo.novell.com
	[137.65.250.26]) by herald.ximian.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787C370036
	for <Dave@ximian.com>; Thu,  4 May 2006 12:27:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from INET-PRV3-MTA by victor.provo.novell.com with
	Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 04 May 2006 10:27:48 -0600
Received: from dejar.provo.novell.com ([137.65.248.45]) by
	monroe.provo.novell.com with ESMTP; Thu, 04 May 2006 10:27:12 -0600
Received: from dejar.provo.novell.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
	dejar.provo.novell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997341B0148; Thu,  4 May
	2006 10:20:31 -0600 (MDT)
X-Original-To: bongo-general@forge.novell.com
Delivered-To: bongo-general@forge.novell.com
Received: from bongo.ximian.com (prv-dmz-foundry1.gns.novell.com
	[137.65.249.211]) by dejar.provo.novell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
	EECEF1B0148 for <bongo-general@forge.novell.com>; Thu,  4 May 2006 10:05:25
	-0600 (MDT)
Received: from erika.provo.novell.com rprice [137.65.171.113] by
	bongo.ximian.com with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 1.7 $ via secured &
	encrypted transport (TLS); Thu, 04 May 2006 11:59:36 -0400
Subject: Re: [Bongo-general] upgrade from 832 to 1399
From: Rodney Price <rprice@bongo.ximian.com>
To: Lionel Dricot <zeploum@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <16a711710605040342j6f2c5db0j7f65a0fc8f36994e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1145781312.810eb64lj@2u2.nu>
	 <200605011952.03683.lxnay@lxnaydesign.net>
	 <16a711710605011154s65681c8dq6e106a3af27f56b6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1146698657.1510.17.camel@erika.provo.novell.com>
	 <16a711710605040342j6f2c5db0j7f65a0fc8f36994e@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 10:05:19 -0600
Message-Id: <1146758719.30036.6.camel@erika.provo.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1 
Cc: bongo-general@forge.novell.com
X-BeenThere: bongo-general@forge.novell.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4
Precedence: list
List-Id: bongo-general.forge.novell.com
List-Unsubscribe: <http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/bongo-general>,
	<mailto:bongo-general-request@forge.novell.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://forge.novell.com/pipermail/bongo-general>
List-Post: <mailto:bongo-general@forge.novell.com>
List-Help: <mailto:bongo-general-request@forge.novell.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/bongo-general>,
	<mailto:bongo-general-request@forge.novell.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: bongo-general-bounces@forge.novell.com
Errors-To: bongo-general-bounces@forge.novell.com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27)\
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 \
X-Evolution-Source: imap://dave@mail.cam.novell.com/
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The threshold in the bongospamd file is the one that will determine if
the AntiSpam agent will; pass the message on untouched, add SpamAssassin
headers, or delete the message.   

The thresholds in etc/spamassassin will determine what the header will
look like in the cases where headers are added.


On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 12:42 +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote:
> You don't have to be sorry. I'm using alpha software knowing what I will have.
> 
> It seems to work now but their is still a problem with the configuration :
> 
> treshold value is set in the admin interface, in the new file and in
> etc/spamassassin. The three are different. Wich one is important ?
> 
> On 5/4/06, Rodney Price <rprice@bongo.ximian.com> wrote:
> > Lionel,
> >
> > The spamassassin issue is probably my fault.   I changed the way that
> > spamassassin is configured in revision 1445.   I have updated the wiki
> > (http://www.bongo-project.org/Setting_Up_SpamAssassin) to show how the
> > new configuration works.
> >
> > The changes were motivated by two issues:
> > 1. On busy bongo queues, one spamd server may not be able to keep up.
> > The configuration has been modified to allow the antispam agent to take
> > advantage of any number of spamd servers.  An entire dual cpu box was
> > dedicated to running spamd for myrealbox.com and it could not keep up.
> > With this new code, it is currently running with cycles to spare on two
> > dedicated spamd servers.
> >
> > 2. There has been interest in adding additional technology options like
> > DSPAM to the antispam agent.  SpamAssassin configuration has been moved
> > to its own attribute (bongospamd) so that more than one scanning service
> > can be added without conflicts caused by using the common attribute of
> > novonyx:configuration.  The code was also refactored to make it easier
> > to add new spam engines.
> >
> > Sorry about the inconvenience, but it will lead to more options for bongo
> > administrators.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 20:54 +0200, Lionel Dricot wrote:
> > > I did the upgrade this weekend and I faced some issue.
> > > http://www.bongo-project.org/Dealing_with_r863 was a great help (you
> > > propably have to adapt a bit for you configuration).
> > >
> > > I still have several unresolved issues :
> > >
> > > - spamassassin is not marking mails anymore. I can see in the log that
> > > it's working, it computes Spam-score but simply doesn't add any header
> > > to mails.
> > >
> > > - pop is not working anymore for thunderbird users (I have a report of
> > > that) but is working for other pop client.
> > >
> > > - webadmin will crash if you try to change the password of a user.
> > > (not always but most of the times)
> > >
> > > From an user POV, I don't see any change between both versions. In
> > > fact, I don't see any change at all except a new queue process.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/1/06, Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@lxnaydesign.net> wrote:
> > > > Alle 10:35, domenica 23 aprile 2006, L. Jankok ha scritto:
> > > > >
> > > > > Nick,
> > > > >
> > > > > I had an even older version of bongo which I have just upgraded to the
> > > > > latest version r14xx. I got the source through the repository and compiled
> > > > > and installed it. All went fine so I didn't have to rollback anything. My
> > > > > upgrade process is just doing a make install and overwriting the old
> > > > > binaries etc. I didn't have to remake anything. All users remained intact.
> > > > > I didn't have to reset any passwords. I didn't loose any user preference.
> > > > > As I said, everthing went fine. Hope this helps.
> > > >
> > > > What's changed on the still unfortunately ugly webmail interface from 8xx to
> > > > 14xx ?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Fabio Erculiani
> > > > lxnaydesign.net
> > > > RR4/RR64 Developer
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Bongo-general mailing list
> > > > Bongo-general@forge.novell.com
> > > > http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/bongo-general
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Bongo-general mailing list
> > > Bongo-general@forge.novell.com
> > > http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/bongo-general
> > >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Bongo-general mailing list
> Bongo-general@forge.novell.com
> http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/bongo-general
> 

_______________________________________________
Bongo-general mailing list
Bongo-general@forge.novell.com
http://forge.novell.com/mailman/listinfo/bongo-general

