From anne@oestergaard.nu  Wed May 17 09:27:14 2006
Return-Path: <anne@oestergaard.nu>
X-Original-To: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Delivered-To: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880CC3B1011
	for <desktop-devel-list@gnome.org>;
	Wed, 17 May 2006 09:27:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 01204-04 for <desktop-devel-list@gnome.org>;
	Wed, 17 May 2006 09:27:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cicero1.cybercity.dk (cicero1.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.4])
	by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA793B0FE9
	for <desktop-devel-list@gnome.org>;
	Wed, 17 May 2006 09:27:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from user1.cybercity.dk (user1.cybercity.dk [212.242.41.34])
	by cicero1.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7138E63EB41
	for <desktop-devel-list@gnome.org>;
	Wed, 17 May 2006 15:27:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from port287.ds1-oebr.adsl.cybercity.dk
	(port287.ds1-oebr.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.116.232])
	by user1.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 1998C74F8B0
	for <desktop-devel-list@gnome.org>;
	Wed, 17 May 2006 15:27:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (qmail 7634 invoked from network); 17 May 2006 13:27:06 -0000
Received: from star.firstimpact.lan (192.168.1.7)
	by goofy.firstimpact.lan with SMTP; 17 May 2006 13:27:06 -0000
From: Anne =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8stergaard?= <anne@oestergaard.nu>
To: Glynn Foster <Glynn.Foster@Sun.COM>
In-Reply-To: <446A5032.2040906@sun.com>
References: <1147791173.6903.39.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	<446A5032.2040906@sun.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 15:27:06 +0200
Message-Id: <1147872426.6866.82.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.524 tagged_above=-999 required=2 tests=[AWL=0.075, 
	BAYES_00=-2.599]
X-Spam-Score: -2.524
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 18 May 2006 08:21:09 -0400
Cc: foundation-announce@gnome.org, foundation-list@gnome.org,
	desktop-devel-list@gnome.org, gnome-hackers@gnome.org
Subject: Re: Call for comments on where to have GUADEC in 2007
X-BeenThere: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GNOME Desktop Development List <desktop-devel-list.gnome.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list>, 
	<mailto:desktop-devel-list-request@gnome.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list>
List-Post: <mailto:desktop-devel-list@gnome.org>
List-Help: <mailto:desktop-devel-list-request@gnome.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list>,
	<mailto:desktop-devel-list-request@gnome.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 13:27:15 -0000

ons, 17 05 2006 kl. 10:20 +1200, skrev Glynn Foster:
> Hi,
> 
> Anne Østergaard wrote:
> > Dear GNOME Foundation Member,
> > 
> > You are invited to comment on where you would prefer to have at GUADEC
> > in 2007.
> > 
> > The period for comments stops on June 15th 2006.
> > 
> > The board (minus Dave Neary and Vincent Untz who are behind the French
> > invitation) will make the final decision.
> > 
> > We have got two very fine invitations to choose among: Birmingham in the
> > UK or Lyon in France. The bids are attached in this mail.
> 
> Neither of the bids have any details about financials and budgets - I 
> think the decisions can't possibly made until we know the details of 
> what the costs involved of hosting in each of the bids.

I agree with this. Financials and budgets are very important issues.

I think that the two bidders are entitled to make an addendum to their
original invitations at the ned of the the period for comments and
questions -
but not later than June 18th.


Anne



