dbp/linamh
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
a624b83566
linamh/sys-libs/glibc/files/2.3.4/glibc-2.3.4-fix-_dl_next_tls_modid-assert.patch
geos_one 5059ab35f3 add glibc 2.10.1 for arm arch 
git-svn-id: https://svn.disconnected-by-peer.at/svn/linamh/trunk/linamh@1552 6952d904-891a-0410-993b-d76249ca496b
2009-09-12 08:46:08 +00:00

269 lines
8.9 KiB
Diff
Raw Blame History

Gentoo bug #52374.
==================
Note, this patch includes both:
-----
2005-01-10 Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
* sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c (_dl_next_tls_modid): Fix assertion and
recognition of last entry.
-----
and:
-----
2005-03-15 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
[BZ#786]
* sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c (_dl_next_tls_modid): Handle
GL(dl_tls_static_nelem) == GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx).
* elf/Makefile: Add rules to build and run tst-tls15.
* elf/tst-tls15.c: New test.
* elf/tst-tlsmod15a.c: New file.
* elf/tst-tlsmod15b.c: New file.
-----
================================================================================
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 09:39:04PM +0200, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
> Basically the issue above. This is valid for glibc 2.3.[234] if I did
> not miss anything. Here is a good test case:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=219352#msg122
>
> I came up with attached patch that seems to work and passes all the
> tests (except for the one or two usual ones). Is this the correct fix,
> or are the problem deeper?
>
>--- glibc-2.3.4/sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c.az 2005-03-13 19:26:55.000000000 +0200
>+++ glibc-2.3.4/sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c 2005-03-13 19:29:14.000000000 +0200
>@@ -69,7 +69,10 @@
> result = GL(dl_tls_static_nelem) + 1;
> /* If the following would not be true we mustn't have assumed
> there is a gap. */
>- assert (result <= GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx));
>+ /* The +1 is needed, as we add +1 above, but dl_tls_static_nelem
>+ is only once set as far as I can see in dl_main (elf/rtld.c),
>+ and that is equal to dl_tls_max_dtv_idx ... */
>+ assert (result <= (GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx) + 1));
> do
> {
> while (result - disp < runp->len)
>@@ -92,7 +95,8 @@
> {
> /* The new index must indeed be exactly one higher than the
> previous high. */
>- assert (result == GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx));
>+ /* Once again +1 for the same reasons as above ... */
>+ assert (result == (GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx) + 1));
>
> /* There is no gap anymore. */
> GL(dl_tls_dtv_gaps) = false;
>
That patch certainly doesn't apply to neither HEAD nor glibc-2_3-branch,
see especially:
2005-01-10 Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
* sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c (_dl_next_tls_modid): Fix assertion and
recognition of last entry.
The fix can either be that dl-open.c only sets GL(dl_tls_dtv_gaps)
to true if GL(dl_tls_static_nelem) < GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx)
(if it is equal, there are certainly no gaps), or handling that case
in _dl_next_tls_modid. In _dl_next_tls_modid, the choices are either
to do what the patch below does, i.e. just clear GL(dl_tls_dtv_gaps)
if that happens, or just change the assert and let the do ... while
loop run, it shouldn't increment result anyway.
2005-03-15 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
[BZ#786]
* sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c (_dl_next_tls_modid): Handle
GL(dl_tls_static_nelem) == GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx).
* elf/Makefile: Add rules to build and run tst-tls15.
* elf/tst-tls15.c: New test.
* elf/tst-tlsmod15a.c: New file.
* elf/tst-tlsmod15b.c: New file.
diff -urpN glibc-2.3.4.az/elf/Makefile glibc-2.3.4/elf/Makefile
--- glibc-2.3.4.az/elf/Makefile 2005-03-15 17:38:36.000000000 +0200
+++ glibc-2.3.4/elf/Makefile 2005-03-15 17:39:07.000000000 +0200
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ tests += loadtest restest1 preloadtest l
neededtest3 neededtest4 unload2 lateglobal initfirst global \
restest2 next dblload dblunload reldep5 reldep6 reldep7 reldep8 \
circleload1 tst-tls3 tst-tls4 tst-tls5 tst-tls6 tst-tls7 tst-tls8 \
- tst-tls10 tst-tls11 tst-tls12 tst-tls13 tst-tls14 tst-align \
+ tst-tls10 tst-tls11 tst-tls12 tst-tls13 tst-tls14 tst-tls15 tst-align \
$(tests-execstack-$(have-z-execstack)) tst-dlmodcount \
tst-dlopenrpath tst-deep1 tst-dlmopen1 tst-dlmopen2 tst-dlmopen3
# reldep9
@@ -182,6 +182,7 @@ modules-names = testobj1 testobj2 testob
tst-tlsmod5 tst-tlsmod6 tst-tlsmod7 tst-tlsmod8 \
tst-tlsmod9 tst-tlsmod10 tst-tlsmod11 tst-tlsmod12 \
tst-tlsmod13 tst-tlsmod13a tst-tlsmod14a tst-tlsmod14b \
+ tst-tlsmod15a tst-tlsmod15b \
circlemod1 circlemod1a circlemod2 circlemod2a \
circlemod3 circlemod3a \
reldep8mod1 reldep8mod2 reldep8mod3 \
@@ -454,6 +455,7 @@ tst-tlsmod10.so-no-z-defs = yes
tst-tlsmod12.so-no-z-defs = yes
tst-tlsmod14a.so-no-z-defs = yes
tst-tlsmod14b.so-no-z-defs = yes
+tst-tlsmod15a.so-no-z-defs = yes
circlemod2.so-no-z-defs = yes
circlemod3.so-no-z-defs = yes
circlemod3a.so-no-z-defs = yes
@@ -664,8 +666,11 @@ $(objpfx)tst-tls12: $(objpfx)tst-tlsmod1
$(objpfx)tst-tls13: $(libdl)
$(objpfx)tst-tls13.out: $(objpfx)tst-tlsmod13a.so
-$(objpfx)tst-tls14: $(objpfx)tst-tlsmod14a.so $(libdl)
-$(objpfx)tst-tls14.out:$(objpfx)tst-tlsmod14b.so
+$(objpfx)tst-tls14: $(objpfx)tst-tlsmod14a.so $(libdl)
+$(objpfx)tst-tls14.out: $(objpfx)tst-tlsmod14b.so
+
+$(objpfx)tst-tls15: $(libdl)
+$(objpfx)tst-tls15.out: $(objpfx)tst-tlsmod15a.so $(objpfx)tst-tlsmod15b.so
CFLAGS-tst-align.c = $(stack-align-test-flags)
CFLAGS-tst-alignmod.c = $(stack-align-test-flags)
diff -urpN glibc-2.3.4.az/elf/tst-tls15.c glibc-2.3.4/elf/tst-tls15.c
--- glibc-2.3.4.az/elf/tst-tls15.c 1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000 +0200
+++ glibc-2.3.4/elf/tst-tls15.c 2005-03-15 17:39:07.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+#include <dlfcn.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+static int
+do_test (void)
+{
+ void *h = dlopen ("tst-tlsmod15a.so", RTLD_NOW);
+ if (h != NULL)
+ {
+ puts ("unexpectedly succeeded to open tst-tlsmod15a.so");
+ exit (1);
+ }
+
+ h = dlopen ("tst-tlsmod15b.so", RTLD_NOW);
+ if (h == NULL)
+ {
+ puts ("failed to open tst-tlsmod15b.so");
+ exit (1);
+ }
+
+ int (*fp) (void) = (int (*) (void)) dlsym (h, "in_dso");
+ if (fp == NULL)
+ {
+ puts ("cannot find in_dso");
+ exit (1);
+ }
+
+ return fp ();
+}
+
+#define TEST_FUNCTION do_test ()
+#include "../test-skeleton.c"
diff -urpN glibc-2.3.4.az/elf/tst-tlsmod15a.c glibc-2.3.4/elf/tst-tlsmod15a.c
--- glibc-2.3.4.az/elf/tst-tlsmod15a.c 1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000 +0200
+++ glibc-2.3.4/elf/tst-tlsmod15a.c 2005-03-15 17:39:07.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+extern int nonexistent_dummy_var;
+int *
+foo (void)
+{
+ return &nonexistent_dummy_var;
+}
diff -urpN glibc-2.3.4.az/elf/tst-tlsmod15b.c glibc-2.3.4/elf/tst-tlsmod15b.c
--- glibc-2.3.4.az/elf/tst-tlsmod15b.c 1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000 +0200
+++ glibc-2.3.4/elf/tst-tlsmod15b.c 2005-03-15 17:39:07.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+#include "tst-tls10.h"
+
+#ifdef USE_TLS__THREAD
+__thread int mod15b_var __attribute__((tls_model("initial-exec")));
+
+int
+in_dso (void)
+{
+ return mod15b_var;
+}
+#else
+int
+in_dso (void)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
diff -urpN glibc-2.3.4.az/sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c glibc-2.3.4/sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c
--- glibc-2.3.4.az/sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c 2005-03-15 17:40:56.000000000 +0200
+++ glibc-2.3.4/sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c 2005-03-15 17:39:07.000000000 +0200
@@ -65,34 +65,35 @@ _dl_next_tls_modid (void)
/* Note that this branch will never be executed during program
start since there are no gaps at that time. Therefore it
does not matter that the dl_tls_dtv_slotinfo is not allocated
- yet when the function is called for the first times. */
- result = GL(dl_tls_static_nelem) + 1;
- /* If the following would not be true we mustn't have assumed
- there is a gap. */
- assert (result <= GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx));
- do
- {
- while (result - disp < runp->len)
- {
- if (runp->slotinfo[result - disp].map == NULL)
- break;
-
- ++result;
- assert (result <= GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx) + 1);
- }
+ yet when the function is called for the first times.
- if (result - disp < runp->len)
- break;
-
- disp += runp->len;
- }
- while ((runp = runp->next) != NULL);
+ NB: the offset +1 is due to the fact that DTV[0] is used
+ for something else. */
+ result = GL(dl_tls_static_nelem) + 1;
+ if (result <= GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx))
+ do
+ {
+ while (result - disp < runp->len)
+ {
+ if (runp->slotinfo[result - disp].map == NULL)
+ break;
+
+ ++result;
+ assert (result <= GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx) + 1);
+ }
+
+ if (result - disp < runp->len)
+ break;
+
+ disp += runp->len;
+ }
+ while ((runp = runp->next) != NULL);
- if (result >= GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx))
+ if (result > GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx))
{
/* The new index must indeed be exactly one higher than the
previous high. */
- assert (result == GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx));
+ assert (result == GL(dl_tls_max_dtv_idx) + 1);
/* There is no gap anymore. */
GL(dl_tls_dtv_gaps) = false;
@@ -577,7 +578,7 @@ __tls_get_addr (GET_ADDR_ARGS)
{
size_t cnt;
- for (cnt = total = 0 ? 1 : 0; cnt < listp->len; ++cnt)
+ for (cnt = total == 0 ? 1 : 0; cnt < listp->len; ++cnt)
{
size_t gen = listp->slotinfo[cnt].gen;
struct link_map *map;
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink